Selamat Guest, Agan dapat mencoba tampilan baru KASKUS Masih Kangen Tampilan Sebelumnya
Home / FORUM / All / News / ... / Berita Luar Negeri /



“Get out of your trucks now, and run away from them. Warning: air strikes are coming. Oil trucks will be destroyed. Get away from your oil trucks immediately. Do not risk your life,” the leaflet reads.
The leaflet drops are justified under the premise that the oil tanker drivers might be civilians and not ISIS recruits, although it’s an explanation that doesn’t wash with critics.

“It’s not like these drivers are innocent, uninvolved ‘civilians’ like children or sick people,” writes J.E. Dyer. “They’re waging ISIS’s war, just like the other non-uniformed participants who make up 100% of ISIS’s ranks. This is how far the Obama administration is going to avoid “collateral damage” — and who knows, it may be worse.”
FrontPageMag’s Daniel Greenfield makes a similar point, commenting, “So after all this time, they came up with a great plan; drop flyers on ISIS trucks so that the drivers, who may or may not be ISIS members, can run away in time. Meanwhile ISIS gets 45 minutes of warning.”
Compare the Obama White House’s approach to fighting ISIS to that of Russia.
While it took the U.S. fifteen months to even begin targeting ISIS’ oil refineries and tankers, air strikes by Moscow destroyed more than 1,000 tankers in a period of just five days.
In comparison, Col. Steve Warren said that the U.S. had taken out only 116 tanker trucks, the “first strike” to target ISIS’ lucrative black market oil business, which funds over 50 per cent of the terror group’s activities.
U.S. air strikes targeting ISIS oil assets are so rare that PBS was caught using footage of Russian fighter jets bombing an oil storage facility in Syria and passing it off as evidence of the U.S. targeting the Islamic State’s oil infrastructure.
U.S. military pilots have also confirmed that they were ordered not to drop 75 per cent of their ordnance on ISIS targets because they could not get clearance from their superiors.
“You went 12 full months while ISIS was on the march without the U.S. using that air power and now as the pilots come back to talk to us they say three-quarters of our ordnance we can’t drop, we can’t get clearance even when we have a clear target in front of us,” said House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce, R-Calif, while retired four-star U.S. general Jack Keane labeled the policy ” an absurdity from the beginning.”
Numerous analysts claim that the Obama White House’s fifteen month wait before it began targeting the primary funding mechanism behind ISIS was part of a tacit policy to help the Islamic State overthrow Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad.
Earlier this year a document emerged confirming that the Pentagon foresaw the rise of ISIS and that western support for Al-Qaeda groups and other anti-Assad rebels in Syria would lead to the emergence of a “Salafist Principality” that would help to “isolate” Assad.
“The bottom line – the almost irrefutable truth – is that the US and its regional allies were all-in on the “use Sunni extremists to bring about regime change in Syria” strategy from the word “go”, and the direct result of that strategy is ISIS,” reports Zero Hedge, adding, “The US didn’t want to cut off Islamic State’s funding, because without money, the group couldn’t fight Assad.”
The New York Times is also reporting that US Central Command may have engaged in a lear long effort to deliberately conceal the fact that the United States’ plan to demolish ISIS was not effective.
Evidence also continues to emerge that ISIS is receiving support from state sponsors of terror like Turkey and Saudi Arabia.
$800,000,000 worth of ISIS oil has been sold in Turkey, a supposed U.S. ally. ISIS trucks are routinely allowed to cross back and forth between the Islamic State stronghold of Raqqa and Turkey, while the NATO country facilitates black market oil sales on behalf of the terror group.
As Nafeez Ahmed documents, a large cache of intelligence recovered from a raid on an ISIS safehouse this summer confirms that “direct dealings between Turkish officials and ranking ISIS members was now ‘undeniable.’”


siapa yg masih mau bersuara AS tdk berpihak pada isis? emoticon-Malu (S)
Diubah oleh Synaiderix
Beri apresiasi terhadap thread ini Gan!
Halaman 1 dari 2
"to kind of shoo people away without harming them."
November 23, 2015 Daniel Greenfield 211

The worst part is that this is Obama's version of an "escalation". He could have taken out ISIS tanker trucks a long time ago, but then the drivers would have died. (Via J.E. Dyer)

"In Al-Bukamal, we destroyed 116 tanker trucks, which we believe will reduce ISIL's ability to transport its stolen oil products," Warren said. "This is our first strike against tanker trucks, and to minimize risks to civilians, we conducted a leaflet drop prior to the strike. We did a show of force, by -- we had aircraft essentially buzz the trucks at low altitude."

The leaflets, which fluttered to the ground about 45 minutes before the strikes, simply said: "Get out of your trucks now, and run away from them. Warning: airstrikes are coming. Oil trucks will be destroyed. Get away from your oil trucks immediately. Do not risk your life."

"We combine these leaflet drops with very low altitude passes of some of our attack aviation, which sends a very powerful message," the colonel added.

He said the decision to drop warnings came after they "assessed that these trucks, while although they are being used for operations that support ISIL, the truck drivers, themselves, probably not members of ISIL; they're probably just civilians."

"So we had to figure out a way around that. We're not in this business to kill civilians, we're in this business to stop ISIL -- to defeat ISIL."

Thus, they tried to come up with a strategy "to kind of shoo people away without harming them."

"So we had to go through that whole process of one, determining whether or not we felt it was in our best interest to strike these trucks. And then once we determined that, yes, it is in our interest to strike these trucks, how do we go about ensuring that we're able to mitigate the potential of civilian casualties? And these things take time," Warren said. "...We know the oil funds more than 50 percent of ISIL's operations. This is something we want to take away from them. That we want -- that we need to take this away from them so that they're -- so they're operations are more difficult to conduct."

So after all this time, they came up with a great plan; drop flyers on ISIS trucks so that the drivers, who may or may not be ISIS members, can run away in time. Meanwhile ISIS gets 45 minutes of warning.

Now you know why we won't actually bomb ISIS' core forces. And so does ISIS. All it has to do is surround itself with civilians and it's invulnerable. Just like the Taliban did in Afghanistan.

Meanwhile ISIS has been financing its operations with money we could have taken away from it, but didn't because it might have meant harming its drivers. Just imagine this bunch of clowns fighting WW2 and we wouldn't need to imagine an alternate version of history in which the Nazis won.

If the left stays in power, the Islamic Nazis will win in this version of history.


Diubah oleh HippoPornStar

sip gan, tq2 emoticon-Big Grin
tgl siap bendung lawan pensboy obambam yg masi aje ngasih penyangkalan bodoh berlandaskan spekulasi
kayaknya kondisi di timteng sendiri semakin panas gan.. kayak nya bakal seru nih kado natal akhir tahun dari timteng.. emoticon-Big Grin

sip bro...liat trid ini jadi pengen ikut nyumbang bahan... emoticon-Shakehand2
Diubah oleh HippoPornStar
Orang2 liberal/democrats kan emang terkenal dari dulu sebagai useful idiots-nya muslims

Apalagi ini si Obama yg nama lengkapnya aja, Barack Hussein Obama
itu yg melakukan airstrike kan AS sendiri... emoticon-Cape d... (S)
beda tempat dg airstrike Rusia yg kemaren...

udah biasa itu leaflets disebar sebelum melakukan airstrike yg berpotensi besar mengenai sipil...
yg punya truk itu kan belum tentu isis...
bisa aja truk sipil juga kena...

oh gitu ya gan, trs ada jaminan isis tetap ditempat ngadepin US saat serangan terjadi? yakin truk2 ISIS jg ga disabotase dgn truk sipil?

baik bgt US emoticon-Matabelo

sungguh mencerminkan suri tauladan yg baik sbg pemimpin ideologi demokrasi yg menjunjung HAM emoticon-Matabelo
kenapa murica ini bisa soft banget ya sama ngisis & kenapa baru diserang setelah rusia bom-bomin dulu? emoticon-Embarrassment

padahal dulu waktu gulf war, konvoi pasukan saddam yg mundur dari kuwait dibabat abis sama murica, operasi yg terkenal dgn 'highway of death' emoticon-Embarrassment
Diubah oleh Mas Fahman

yg penting sebisa mungkin ngindarin korban sipil gan...

itu video airstrike Rusia ke truk2 isis , juga pas dalam kondisi terparkir rapi ga ada orangnya...
Diubah oleh maduramen

di video pembantaian kilang minyak yg satu ini ada ah gan:

emoticon-Malu (S)

"“Get out of your trucks now, and run away from them. Warning: air strikes are coming. Oil trucks will be destroyed. Get away from your oil trucks immediately. Do not risk your life,” the leaflet reads."

Kalau yg punya oil trucks itu sipil ngapain juga diserang?

Lagian ngapain juga lu capek2 belain Amerika yg sekarang dipimpin si Barack Hussein Obama

Tuh dia lagi gencar2nya pengen masukin imigran2 muslim Suriah ke Amrik, biar mereka pada bisa berjihad.
Diubah oleh 5tef3

kok jadi ke kilang minyak , kan lagi ngomongin truk yg bersifat mobile...
sehingga potensi korban sipil lebih besar...

kalo kilang minyaknya udah dikuasai isis, udah jelas itu isis semua penghuninya...

btw , gue ga melihat ada orang yg di jadiin sasaran di video itu...

emang terlihat ada satu orang , tapi luput dari pemboman ...
dan kalo ngomong soal penyebaran leaflets , itu emang peraturan dalam perang , untuk meminimalisir korban sipil ...

Rusia pun juga begitu , menyebarkan leaflets sebelum menargetkan target2 yg berpotensi mengenai sipil...

The US dropped these leaflets to warn civilian truck drivers ofan incoming airstrike on 283 oil truck tankers in Syria on Sunday, urging them to get out of their trucks and run before the attacks began


Karena bo'ol Obama mantep gan emoticon-Recommended Seller

pengen nyoba ?
Diubah oleh maduramen

Jelas2 katanya truk2 minyaknya digunakan untuk mensupport ISIS,
nih dari link yg lu post

The Pentagon says that while the trucks were being used to support ISIS, the drivers themselves were not thought to be jihadists.


Lu pikir ada gitu orang2 non-muslim atau non-ISIS ngendarain truk2 minyaknya ISIS.
Toh di manual book aja, dikatakan jangan mempercayai orang2 kafir.

If you drive a truck for ISIS you are ISIS. If you are a supplier to ISIS you are ISIS.

Diubah oleh 5tef3

aneh yah...waktu US airstrike di Iraq dan Afghanistan gak pernah sebar leaflets supaya sipil menghindar yah bro emoticon-Embarrassment
Diubah oleh HippoPornStar

eh iya baru kepikiran ane. loh kok bisa gitu gan? ah AS pilih kasih nih emoticon-Mad (S) jgn2 pelopor demokrasi yg sbnrnya adalah rusia. kan katanya rusia ikut nyebar leaflets. ga pilih kasih kan dia? emoticon-Ngakak (S)

Beda presiden, beda partai.

bah itu kan truk ada juga yg milik si penadah bos , dan penadahnya ya perusahaan asing la bos ..

artinya belum tentu itu supir anggota isis bos....

kapir sih kapir kalo duitnya ya kagak emoticon-Ngakak


ah kata siapa ?
Diubah oleh maduramen
Halaman 1 dari 2

GDP Network
© 2018 KASKUS, PT Darta Media Indonesia. All rights reserved
Ikuti KASKUS di