Dear agan2 sekalian, berikut top 50 ranking universitas dari QS yg paling terbaru (2013/2014):

Note:
Bold Merah = Universitas dari Indonesia
Garis Bawah = Universitas dari Regional (Asia Pasific)
Biru = Universitas dari Asia Tenggara (South East Asia)
Mulai dari ranking #500 ga ada peringkat spesifik, #700+ juga ga ada peringkat spesifik











Sedih gan UI turun peringkat, tahun lalu masih peringkat 200+ sekarang jadi 300+

Gimana menurut agan2 sekalian? Terutama gimana tanggapan kaskuser yg merupakan bagian dari top 800 elite universitas tersebut?

Jangan lupa dirate ya gan




Pertanyaan agan2 sekalian:

Q: Peringkatinnya berdasarkan apa?
A: http://www.topuniversities.com/unive...gs-methodology
Bagi yg males baca ane ringkasin dari websitenya langsung

Intinya dia peringkatin berdasarkan 6 kriteria:
1. Academic reputation (40%)
Academic reputation is measured via a global survey, asking academics to tell us where the best work is currently taking place within their field of expertise.

2. Employer reputation (10%)
The employer reputation indicator is also based on a global survey, this time taking in 27,900 responses. The survey asks graduate employers to identify the universities that in their view produce the best graduates. It is unique among international university rankings.

3. Student-to-faculty ratio (20%)
This is simple measure of the number of academic staff employed for every student enrolled. In the absence of an international standard by which to measure teaching quality, it provides an insight into which universities are well equipped to provide small class sizes and a good degree of individual supervision.

4. Citations per faculty (20%)
This indicator aims to assess universities’ research output. A citation means a piece of research being cited (referred to) within another piece of research. Generally, the more often a piece of research is cited by others, the more influential it is. So the more highly cited research papers a university publishes, the stronger its research output is considered.

5. International faculty ratio (5%)
6. International student ratio (5%)
Finally, the last two indicators focus on assessing how international a university is, by measuring the proportion of international students and faculty members in relation to overall numbers. Each of these contributes 5% to the overall ranking results.
While a highly international student or faculty body is not in itself a measure of quality, there is a clear correlation between international intake and success in other areas such as academic reputation and research citations. Universities that combine high scores in the round with an international outlook tend to be those that have successfully turned themselves into international centers of excellence.

Komeng dari agan2 sekalian:

Sorry gan ane kurang setuju, kalo ente lulusan universitas top dunia, ente bakalan dicari2 oleh employer seluruh dunia, mulai dari perusahaan besar sampai organisasi internasional. Memang gak ada jaminan 100% bahwa ente lulusan universitas top trus pasti jadi konglomerat / presiden, semua kembali ke orangnya masing2. Tapi kalo ente ngeliat persentase orang yg jadi orang sukses dari universitas ternama itu pasti lebih besar daripada orang sukses yang mungkin sama sekali ga sekolah / pendidikan sangat rendah (kita tau Lim Siauw Liong / Sudono Salim; tapi orang kaya Sudono Salim hanya ada berapa di dunia ini? Trus kalo memang ga usah sekolah tinggi2 toh juga ntar terakhir2nya cari duit, kenapa anak2 konglomerat yg mungkin mereka sendiri juga pendidikan relatif rendah / ga tinggi2 amat mau anaknya sekolah setinggi mungkin di sekolah sebagus mungkin? Just my 2 cents