Two 'Spider-Man: No Way Home' villains reveal Marvel’s laziest mistake

https://flip.it/QDuWjB

.....

That doesn’t mean Marvel and Sony had to do what they did in No Way Home. The new film brings Sandman and the Lizard to life almost solely as CGI characters, with Ifans and Church returning just to read voice-over lines.

And for the few moments where Sandman and the Lizard return to their human forms in No Way Home’s third act, Marvel and Sony simply repurposed shots of them from Spider-Man 3 and The Amazing Spider-Man.

THE SHORT END OF THE STICK — The Lizard being a CGI character in Spider-Man: No Way Home makes sense, but the same can’t be said for Sandman. Unlike Ifans’ Curt Connors, Church’s Flint Marko can go back and forth between his human and sand forms whenever he wants. Having him maintain his sand form for all of Spider-Man: No Way Home is therefore a weird choice, especially since the CGI necessary to bring him to life never looks good.

Illogical narrative choices and bad CGI aside, the creative decision to just reuse shots from Spider-Man 3 and The Amazing Spider-Man for Sandman and the Lizard’s transformations at the end of No Way Home is inexcusable. Not only are the shots clearly from those films, but they’re also awkwardly shoved into No Way Home’s climax. Neither actor says anything when they appear, which forces the film to cut from their repurposed transformations to shots of Andrew Garfield and Tobey Maguire saying lines to actors who very obviously aren’t on the other side of the camera.

Could Marvel and Sony really not get Ifans and Haden Church back in costume to read new lines? Not even for a day? Given how many actors from Sony’s past Spider-Man films they convinced to come back for No Way Home, it seems more likely that the two studios simply thought they didn’t need to put in the same amount of effort for Haden Church and Ifans as they did for Willem Dafoe and Alfred Molina.

.....

---- > omg..... Disney dan sony, sama2 sempat bikin blunder spt itu dlm film spider 3 nya tom......