siapa lagi :D gw penasaran sih, dia sampe bela2in bikin banyak id, saling quote satu sama lain seolah orang2 yg beda, tujuan nya apa ya? :bingung mungkin 1 id, 1 draft kliping ya Mungkin dia kesepian :lehuga malam forsex. 1 minggu ini full busy :nohope: Kirain kemakan kutukan :ngakak
2 seri terakhir emang mundur jauh, yg sebelumnya maju mundur, gk sabar nunggu winter sale buat angkut Odyssey :ngacir: dari sisi makhluk mitologinya doang sih.. orang malay tuh.. sering di bp/bpln setahu saya btw fans nya lagi kumat lagi tuh mod, di lounge bpln :lehuga siapa? drunk? :l
msh mending, gan... ente di kafirkan via dunia maya, lah, kalo sesama seagama di dunia nyata tp tetap di kafirkan, hny krn beda opini ttg 1 kasus penistaan agama.... gimana itu donk, gan ?? :tepar btw, met pg semua............ :wagelaseh tau deh, saya juga pernah tuh dikafirin di mesjid gegara
soalnya main storyline nya udah selesai di AC III sih, makanya bingun arahnya kemana IMO, ACO sama ACOD bikin lore AC jadi nonsensical
Result from Googling a bit, loli itu singkatan lolita, yang diambil dari novel Lolita karangan Vladimir Nabokov. Isinya cerita profesor yang terobsesi sama cewek 12 tahun, with connection to real life pedophilia case to boot. So.......
Bisa kan? Tinggal submit kreator aja toh, kan nanti ada review juga. Edit: kalau di trit lama ga bisa, bikin baru aja kalau mau submit kreator
how do we know that god want us to love him? let's say we know it form the scriptures, then how do we know the scriptures are true? because the scripture said it is true? this kind of circular reasoning cannot be used as an philosophical argument. to prove something is true, some sort of evidenc...
Cara summonnya gimana? Maybe by chanting "earth is flat" or "evolution isnt real" :lehuga:lehuga:lehuga:lehuga
i am always up for new things :D how will i do it? by writing argumentation numbered (16) (17) and so on, a short sentences boiled down from my previous answers? You can certainly do it that way of you want to
goodness, i never imagine my schedule will one day be as busy as the last few days :D let me show you another example, the original argument is as follow: (1) God is omnipotent (that is, all-powerful). (2) God is omniscient (that is, all-knowing). (3) God is perfectly good. (4) Evil exists. (5) ...
this whole... living experience to a degree is akin to a mmo. where some believe there's an omnipotent GM that brought.. order, justice, compassion, balance, etc. and when you play by the perceived rules you'll be granted end game content. meanwhile some other simply hack their way and learn ab
1. while (4) is true and evil keeps doing evil with its free will, actually God is not the author of evil, but He use evil's action to attain objectives, and evil will be done away with after that all purposes related to it is achieved. and God will stop evil even before it do anything if God doesn
additional note, in philosophical discussion, especially in inductive (or deductive? i always mixed up those terms) approach that we used here, we generally need to definitely define the premises. in my 12 point example, the premises are (1)-(4), i could elaborate it further or define it more pre...
getting better, but still, you're responding directly into the premises. boil it down further. let me give you a hand: take point 5 to 7 for example, (5) If God is omnipotent, he would be able to prevent all of the evil and suffering in the world. (6) If God is omniscient, he would know about all...
isnt that the general stance science take anyway? makanya dalam trit historis dan saintifik saya generally ga welcome argumen "because of god". paling saya okekan di sini dan trit filosofi
no, that too long. boil it down to the core argument, just 2 or 3 lines max. and you dont have to reply all the point, thats just the structure. the final point should be your conclusion, and all the point above it should be your premises or supporting fact. you can also edit any of those point w...