alexa-tracking

Main Content

1024
1024
KASKUS
51
244
https://www.kaskus.co.id/thread/527c8c413dcb17bb05000000/next-step-of-us-strategies-to-contain-china-navy
Next Step of US Strategies To contain China Navy
Quote:RAND Suggests Using Land-based ASMs Against China

Nov. 7, 2013 - 08:46PM | By WENDELL MINNICK

TAIPEI — A new RAND report suggests the US military consider turning China’s anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) strategy on its head by incorporating a “far blockade” strategy using land-based anti-ship missiles (ASM) at chokepoints in the Asia-Pacific region.

Quote:Next Step of US Strategies To contain China Navy
New China Navy Destroyer, Type 052C


The new report, “Employing Land-Based Anti-Ship Missiles in the Western Pacific,” looks at how the US military, in a joint or coalition effort using an integrated network of land-based ASMs, could shut down China’s naval movements.

With massive Pentagon budget cuts coming, land-based ASMs would be “inexpensive joint force multipliers.” The report provides detailed geospatial depictions of how this strategy could paralyze China’s navy.

The release of the report coincides with Japan’s announcement that it is conducting an exercise that places Type-88 surface-to-ship missiles on Miyako Island. It is the first time Japan has conducted such an exercise. The strait between Okinawa and Miyako is a common access route to the Pacific by the Chinese navy.

At present, the US military has no ground-based ASM capabilities in the region, but if the US military had such capabilities, it could use them in a host of ways, ranging from security cooperation initiatives to help regional friends improve their own anti-access capabilities to using them to interdict Chinese warships or help form a full blockade during war.

Though the advice given in the report sounds suspiciously like a containment policy, the authors argue this “capability does not require the permanent stationing of assets in the Western Pacific, and, as such, is not presented as part of an effort to contain China. Rather, it should be seen as a capability that could be used if China initiated a conflict.”

The report makes a missile-by-missile comparison of 45 current ASMs commonly found in the region: Brunei, China, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Taiwan, and Vietnam. “We assessed the likely effectiveness of land-based ASMs by exploring the technical potential and possible impact of a U.S. anti-access strategy that could challenge Chinese maritime freedom of action should China choose to use force against its island neighbors.”

The report only examines the possibility of cutting off Chinese sea routes using land-based ASMs, and does not look at other ASM launch platforms, such as air or sea. The report argues that land-based ASMs would not only have a significant effect on China’s ability to project power, “but it would also vastly expand the set of military problems that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) would face should it consider initiating a conflict with its neighbors or U.S. partner nations.”

Why? Because land-based ASM systems are so easy to operate and are strategically and tactically mobile. ASMs could be placed in many locations over thousands of miles of island chains, which “would significantly dilute the effectiveness of PLA missile and air forces.”

To illustrate the potential of ground-based ASM employment, the report demonstrates how short and medium-range ASMs could force the PLA Navy out of the Straits of Malacca, Sunda, and Lombok.

If Taiwan and Japan became involved in a conflict with China, ASMs with an effective range of only 100-200 km stationed on the island of Okinawa and northern Taiwan could cover all PLA naval traffic south of Okinawa. If Taiwan did not want to participate in a coalition effort to block these waterways, Japan could place ASMs with a 200 km range on the Ryukyu Islands.

The Luzon Strait between the Philippines and Taiwan, and the waterways between the Philippines and Borneo, could be covered with 100 km range ASMs positioned in Taiwan, Malaysia, and the Philippines.

The PLA Navy might attempt to transit between Japan and South Korea via the Korea Strait. In this scenario, 200 km range ASMs from either Japan or South Korea would be sufficient.

Should China threaten or use force against US allies in the region, “the US might want such assets available” and “would need to be able to rapidly move ASMs into the region from US territory or from other prepositioned stocks in Asia.”

The report focuses only on operational and tactical issues, and does not analyze regional political, economic, and military dimensions of these operations.

DefenseNews


US sudah lama mendeklarasikan diri menjadi centeng ASEAN rupanya emoticon-Matabelo emoticon-Matabelo

Sekiranya China bermain main di Laut China Selatan dengan gegabah bakalan mudah bagi Indonesia untuk meminta akses persenjataan dan teknologi dari US buat modernisasi militer Indonesia, bahkan termasuk Land Based Harpoon emoticon-Matabelo

Segera beli land based Onyx dech, ikutin langkah Vietnam ................ emoticon-Ngacir
Padahal Amerika masih jauh lebih kuat dr China, sepertinya alasannya dibuat2 utk naikin/mempertahankan budget militermya
Quote:Original Posted By Ardent99
Padahal Amerika masih jauh lebih kuat dr China, sepertinya alasannya dibuat2 utk naikin/mempertahankan budget militermya


Quote:With massive Pentagon budget cuts coming, land-based ASMs would be “inexpensive joint force multipliers.” The report provides detailed geospatial depictions of how this strategy could paralyze China’s navy.
Quote:Original Posted By madokaichi


US sudah lama mendeklarasikan diri menjadi centeng ASEAN rupanya emoticon-Matabelo emoticon-Matabelo

Sekiranya China bermain main di Laut China Selatan dengan gegabah bakalan mudah bagi Indonesia untuk meminta akses persenjataan dan teknologi dari US buat modernisasi militer Indonesia, bahkan termasuk Land Based Harpoon emoticon-Matabelo

Segera beli land based Onyx dech, ikutin langkah Vietnam ................ emoticon-Ngacir

IDEM tante.. emoticon-Malu (S)
Mungkin ini juga yg menjadikan CHINA tidak terang-terangan nyerempet ZEE kita d natuna.. emoticon-army

Dan china juga akan berusaha sebisa mungkin untuk memposisikan indonesia sebagai negara netral d konflik LCS ini".
Mungkin mereka berpandangan indonesia punya kemampuan untuk jd negara super power d asean pada dekade mendatang.."
Tinggal pihak kita negosiasi dengan pihak china untuk tidak ngrempet ZEE kita" china pst mau kok win-win solution dengan kita.. CMIIW
Dan disini cukup senang dgn sebutan tsb......punya potensi/kemampuan.
Quote:Original Posted By edge55

IDEM tante.. emoticon-Malu (S)
Mungkin ini juga yg menjadikan CHINA tidak terang-terangan nyerempet ZEE kita d natuna.. emoticon-army

Dan china juga akan berusaha sebisa mungkin untuk memposisikan indonesia sebagai negara netral d konflik LCS ini".
Mungkin mereka berpandangan indonesia punya kemampuan untuk jd negara super power d asean pada dekade mendatang.."
Tinggal pihak kita negosiasi dengan pihak china untuk tidak ngrempet ZEE kita" china pst mau kok win-win solution dengan kita.. CMIIW


anti stealth radarnya effective gak tuh ?
kalo iya kita wajib ToT tuh kapal emoticon-Matabelo
nunggu penjelasan plengker ah emoticon-Matabelo
AShM apa yang mo di taruh?
MMT-kah? bisa cover ribuan kilo tuh emoticon-rainbow
Quote:Original Posted By 8200
Dan disini cukup senang dgn sebutan tsb......punya potensi/kemampuan.




Tergantung kebijakan rezim 2014 emoticon-Malu (S)
kapalnya mantep emoticon-Matabelo
Quote:Original Posted By edge55


Tergantung kebijakan rezim 2014 emoticon-Malu (S)


dan lagi.. beda rezim beda keputusan.. rencana jangka panjang bisa dipangkas emoticon-Nohope
Quote:Original Posted By inalvaganza


dan lagi.. beda rezim beda keputusan.. rencana jangka panjang bisa dipangkas emoticon-Nohope


ga usah beda rezim beda menteri juga beda kebijakan kokemoticon-Ngakak
Lembaga think thank dari TNI sendiri kok gak pernah kedengaran yach penelitian yang mereka lakukan emoticon-No Hope emoticon-No Hope
Quote:Original Posted By alena.aremania
kapalnya mantep emoticon-Matabelo


Kenapa gk d tambahin dengan kata-kata apakah TNI tertarik..? emoticon-Ngacir
Quote:Original Posted By edge55


Kenapa gk d tambahin dengan kata-kata apakah TNI tertarik..? emoticon-Ngacir


tepatnya 'buatan negara ASIA, bisa untuk COIN dan bebas embargo, apakah TNI tertarik? emoticon-Ngacir
Quote:Original Posted By kimi mabok


tepatnya 'buatan negara ASIA, bisa untuk COIN dan bebas embargo, apakah TNI tertarik? emoticon-Ngacir


persis sama agniemoticon-Ngakak
Quote:Original Posted By kimi mabok


tepatnya 'buatan negara ASIA, bisa untuk COIN dan bebas embargo, apakah TNI tertarik? emoticon-Ngacir


Ah ci M'bah jd AGNi wannabe.. emoticon-Big Grin
Asal jangan ketularan posting pic BWK jaemoticon-Malu (S)
gak usah terlena dengan sikap ramah-tamahnya RRC....tetap upgrade TNI yg terintegrasi laah
×