Quote:
Air Force expects to test counter-electronics missile in 2016
NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. — On the convention center screen, an animated cruise missile flew over a shadowy cartoon city. A beam of high-power microwaves emitted from its nose — and the target building went dark. More significantly, the ones around it stayed lit up.
Developed over the past half decade under a program called Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project (CHAMP), the technology for a steerable counter-electronics weapon will be “available” in 2016, said Maj. Gen. Tom Masiello, who commands the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL).
“It can target electronics well enough to fly over a city and shut down electronics in a single building,” Masiello said Tuesday at the Air Force Association’s annual conference here.
Tests over the past few years have proved the concept; now the AFRL is working to get the technology into a test missile. By 2016, Masiello said, the lab plans to design, develop and test a multishot, multitarget, high-power microwave package aboard an AGM-86 conventional air-launched cruise missile.
Beyond that, Masiello said, AFRL’s roadmap for high-power microwave (HPM) weapons calls for integrating the technology onto “maybe, a JASSM-ER-type weapon” in the mid-2020s and aboard “small reusable platforms” such as the F-35 or advanced UAVs by the end of the decade.
It’s unclear whether such weapons will actually enter production; there’s no program of record yet, he said.
But his own opinion is clear; he talked about the HPM concept in “Game Changers,” a presentation that also included discussions of hypersonics and autonomous systems.
Last year’s test flight of the X-51 hypersonic test vehicle achieved Mach 4.8 and 200 seconds of ramjet power — far beyond the previous record of seven seconds.
“That really put hypersonics on the map,” Masiello said. “It really added a lot of momentum to the program.”
As for increasingly sophisticated autonomy, Masiello said, “This has the potential to dwarf everything.”
But he took pains to make clear: “It’s not about taking the airman out of the weapon system, it’s about making an effective team.”
Militarytimes
Quote:
Counter-electronics High Power Microwave Advanced Missile Project
The U.S. Air Force has been turning old cruise missiles into computer-destroying weapons of mass disruption.
It’s known as CHAMP, or the Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project. Designed to conduct non-lethal electronic attacks on cities, the device can fly over densely populated areas and hit targets with powerful, precise shots of microwave energy.
The effect is comparable to the electromagnetic pulse from a high-altitude nuclear explosion, except smaller and targeted far more precisely. Which means you don’t have to blow stuff up.
But beyond highly-publicized demonstrations and a $38 million research program, the military has failed to prepare the technology for battle.
That’s despite its potential to wreak havoc on unfriendly war hubs such as air defense systems, communications towers and command-and-control posts that depend on computers.
Boeing and the Air Force Research Laboratory proved the concept during an operational test in 2012. The missile shot across the Utah desert and zapped multiple targets at different locations, shutting down rooms full of computers.
“The CHAMP missile navigated a pre-programmed flight plan and emitted bursts of high-powered energy, effectively knocking out the target’s data and electronic subsystems,” Boeing explained in a 2012 press release. “CHAMP allows for selective, high-frequency radio wave strikes against numerous targets during a single mission.”
On March 25, AFRL’s directed energy office at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico stated that the test missile produced the intended results. The office added that there are no technological challenges standing in the way of CHAMP becoming a deployable weapon.
The Air Force could also deploy the device in different ways, depending on the particular mission. The CHAMP itself doesn’t have to be on board a missile — a drone or fighter jet could carry one, laboratory officials said.
The Air Force started the program in 2009. But six years later, there’s still no formal program to push the technology through to development and production.
Last year, lawmakers passed legislation compelling the flying branch to build the counter-electronics missile by 2016, and added $10 million in the government’s 2015 budget specifically to get the project started.
At two recent House Armed Services Committee hearings, Florida Rep. Richard Nugent challenged senior Air Force leaders on the service’s commitment to produce a CHAMP missile as required by law. The responses were uninspiring.
“Do we plan to produce this weapon by [fiscal year] 2016?” Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh said. “No, sir, we can’t get there from here.”
According to Welsh, the Air Force builds weapons and electronic warfare equipment in two separate “capability portfolios.” These two programs have had trouble coming together to produce an operational CHAMP system.
Instead of a deployable, high-power microwave missile, the United States will get a “cross-functional study” this summer. “This system has been tested and works,” Nugent said. “This is not a limitation on technology, authority or funding.”
According to Nugent, the Air Force has excess cruise missiles in its inventory due to the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty with Russia. The flying branch must demilitarize these surplus missiles, but could re-purpose them into CHAMP weapons without violating the treaty.
According to one electronic warfare expert, who spoke on background, high-power microwave devices such as CHAMP make wonderful non-kinetic weapons because they destroy electronics … rather than temporarily jam them.
And they don’t kill civilians.
“In recent conflicts, some civilian infrastructure nodes have been targeted for degradation, but were not intended to be fully destroyed — because of unintended effects on civilian populations, collateral casualties, or wanting to preserve them for later rebuilding,” the source wrote.
“CHAMP makes a wonderful non-kinetic weapon that can create persistent, destructive effects, but with greater control over unintended or unwanted destruction.
“Jamming has to be applied continuously for the effects to occur. Once taken away, systems are operable again. With a high-power microwave, you are degrading/destroying that equipment and can move on to other targets. The increased miniaturization of electronics only enhances their vulnerability to high-power microwaves.”
The technology could give the U.S. the upper hand in a war against sophisticated foes. But it also has applications in a counter-terrorism campaign, where a conventional strike on an insurgent’s urban command post might kill bystanders.
The Pentagon knows exactly how devastating this type of weapon system would be on American forces. The government spends billions of dollars hardening its critical electronic systems against electromagnetic pulses.
The Air Force Research Laboratory has been working on non-lethal, non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse weapons for more than two decades, and the CHAMP demonstration in 2012 was a high water mark.
AFRL chief Maj. Gen. Thomas Masiello said at an Air Force Symposium last September that the technology for a steerable, counter-electronics weapon would be ready in 2016.
Masiello said the device could be part of a conventional cruise missile, such as the extended-range Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile, or even an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter by the end of the decade.
But weaponizing the technology requires a program office and sustained funding. Today, no such office exists. Instead, AFRL is looking at ways to improve CHAMP while senior decision makers dither.
War Is Boring Medium.com
Protecting vehicles from cyber attacks
Feb. 3, 2014 - 03:44PM | By KEVIN G. COLEMAN |
The modernization of military equipment comes with multiple challenges. Have you ever heard of an initiative called “Victory?” It stands for Vehicle Integration for C4ISR/EW Interoperability, and is an initiative created to address the significant problems created by the "bolt on" approach used to equip U.S. Army vehicles.
Victory is a modular open systems architecture (MOSA), created to allow systems to share information and provide an integrated picture to vehicle crews. After all, the overall construct for modern battle systems is all about two things: A common view of the threat environment (battlefield) that is clearly communicated in what has been called real-time-enough fashion, and interoperability of all the disparate systems.
We are rapidly moving toward full integration of vehicles into our C4ISR systems with additional capabilities. With all these systems and electronics, protection is a must. It is unclear if the vehicle C4ISR systems will be hardened to withstand a non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapon (an EMP generated by conventional means).
That threat became very real after a Boeing video demonstrating the CHAMP system was posted online in October 2012. The CHAMP systems is the result of a $38 million, three-year program. Given that the U.S. has the most modern military in the world, our enemies must be actively seeking advanced capabilities like this and we should not lose sight of the fact that battlefield cyber attacks on these systems are a real threat as well.
You would hope that with the problems produced by the “bolt on” approach that created the need for project Victory, cyber security will be built in and not bolted on as with most of our systems today.
Defense News
bisa dipasang di cruise missile diarahin ke kapal perang bisa bikin kapalnya "mati lampu"